PokerToast · study tools for mixed-game poker
In Razz, should I complete with a pair in my starting hand (7-3-3) against a King bring-in?
Heads-up, PokerToast's limit Razz solver completes with 7-3-3 against a King bring-in 99.6% of the time.
The spot
- Game: heads-up limit Razz, 3rd street.
- You: (3♠ 3♦) 7♣ (down cards in brackets): a pair of 3s in the hole and a 7 showing: only two different low ranks, so it is really a two-card hand.
- Your opponent: shows a King and brought in (up: K♥).
- Pot before this street: 0.3 small bets (the antes).
- Pot size and the numbers: the solver groups pots by size: its numbers here are averages over every pot of up to 1.5 small bets at this point, so in exactly this pot they would be a little different.
The solver's numbers
| Play | How often (strategy) | Worth from here on (EV estimate, small bets) |
|---|---|---|
| Complete | 99.6% | +0.41 |
| Call the bring-in | 0.4% | +0.33 |
| Fold | 0.0% | +0.00 |
Measured on 45,143 play-outs of this situation. The highlighted row is the play that measured best.
Why, in plain words
Complete and call the bring-in are worth about the same here (0.07 small bets apart, within the measuring noise of about 0.10), so neither is a real mistake; the solver's usual choice is to complete (99.6%).
One limit of the model: here, when you just call, the street ends; under real rules the bring-in could still complete. That makes calling look a little better than it is, so where calling and completing are close, completing is at least as good.
What popular strategy articles say
We found no published answer to this exact spot (AI search, checked 2026-10-08).
Among the sources AI search surfaced, the numbers on this page are the only direct answer to this spot.
Heads-up vs multiway
The numbers above are for heads-up play (two players). Most published advice is written for full-ring games with several players in the pot, so part of any difference can come from that.
3-handed (the bring-in shows a King and a third player showing a Queen is still to act behind you), PokerToast's 3-handed solver completes 59% of the time and just calls the bring-in 41%. So the heads-up answer holds with three players.
| Play | How often (strategy) | Worth from here on (EV estimate, small bets) |
|---|---|---|
| Complete | 59.2% | +0.53 |
| Call the bring-in | 40.8% | +0.50 |
| Fold | 0.0% | +0.00 |
From the 3-handed limit Razz solver, trained 25,358,751 iterations, exported 2026-10-05 18:07:23, 172,805 situations (version R33-25358751-20261005180723); measured on 4,636 play-outs.
How these numbers were made
From PokerToast's own heads-up limit Razz solver, trained 3,690,500 iterations, exported 2026-10-05 09:56:29, 35,165 situations (version R-3690500-20261005095629). It learned by self-play (Monte Carlo counterfactual regret minimization) for limit betting, at most four bets a street.
- How often is the solver's average strategy for this situation.
- Worth (EV) is an estimate measured after training by playing the situation out many times against the solver's own strategy: small bets won or lost from this decision on, compared with folding (0). It assumes an opponent who plays like the solver.
- Hand groups: the solver groups similar hands, so the numbers are for the group (here:
0|D270|1-|S|i), not only these exact cards. For each decision it looks at the street; your hand (a made 8-or-better low and how good it is, or how many cards you have toward an 8-low and how many of the low cards you need your opponent already shows); your opponent's board (how many high cards, "bricks", and their highest low card); the size of the pot; and the betting so far on this street. - Stakes: ante 0.15 small bets per player, bring-in 0.25, a completion or bet on 3rd and 4th street is 1 small bet, 2 from 5th street.
- Looked up when this page was built (2026-10-19); a newly trained solver changes the page and its version number.
Practice it
Your equity with these cards Today's Razz Daily Spot Open PokerToast
Part of: Razz 3rd street: completing, stealing and defending the bring-in
More Razz spots: Razz: complete 8-6-3 against a King bring-in? · Razz: defend the bring-in with A-2 under a King when a 5 completes? · Razz: slowplay A-2-3 or complete against a King bring-in? · Razz: complete A-2-3 against a low (6) bring-in? · Razz 4th street: you catch a King, the opponent shows 5-2 and bets. Call or fold? · Razz 7th street: call with a 9-low against K-8-4-2? · Razz: steal with a 7 up (K-Q in the hole) against a King bring-in? · Razz 5th street: 7-5-2 with two bricks against 6-4-3. Fold? · Razz: brought in with an 8 (6-3 under), a 7 completes. Call or re-raise? · Razz: defend the bring-in with 3-2 under a Queen when an 8 completes? · Razz 4th street: you catch a 2, the opponent catches a King. Bet or check? · Razz 4th street: you pair your 3, the opponent shows 6-4 and bets. Call or fold? · Razz 5th street: a made 9-8 low against 6-4-3 showing. Call, raise or fold? · Razz 6th street: a made 8-7 low against 7-5-4-2 showing. Call, raise or fold? · Razz: complete a three-card 9 (9-5-2) against a King bring-in? · Razz: a three-card 9 (9-5-2) against an 8 bring-in. Complete, call or fold? · Razz 7th street: an 8-7 low against 9-8-4-2, checked to you. Bet or check? · Razz: you complete 7-4-2, the 6 bring-in re-raises. Cap, call or fold? · Razz 5th street: four to a 7 with one brick against 6-4-3 showing. Call? · Razz 4th street: you both catch bricks and you act first. Bet or check? · Razz: a rough three-card 8 (8-7-6) against a 7 bring-in. Complete? · Razz: defend the bring-in with 8-5 under a King when a 7 completes?