PokerToast · study tools for mixed-game poker

In Razz 4th street, my 7-5-3 caught another 3 (a pair); my opponent shows 6-4 and bets. Call or fold?

Heads-up, PokerToast's limit Razz solver calls with 7-5-3-3 against 6-4 showing 95% of the time.

The spot

The solver's numbers

The solver's answer
PlayHow often (strategy)Worth from here on (EV estimate, small bets)
Call94.9%+1.12
Raise5.1%+0.80
Fold0.0%+0.00

Measured on 663 play-outs of this situation. The highlighted row is the play that measured best.

Why, in plain words

Call and raise are worth about the same here (0.32 small bets apart, within the measuring noise of about 0.35), so neither is a real mistake; the solver's usual choice is to call (95%).

What popular strategy articles say

Pairing one of your low cards on 4th street or later usually means you are drawing too thin to continue: fold pairs early rather than calling once to see what comes.

What strategy articles found by web search said on 2026-10-08 (PokerNews, Card Player, PokerStrategy, pokerskill and similar; mostly written between about 2007 and 2015, and mostly for full-ring games with several players in the pot).

Heads-up, the solver disagrees: it practically never chooses the recommended play (fold); its main play is call (95%).

Measured value from here on: call +1.12 small bets, fold 0 (folding).

Heads-up vs multiway

The numbers above are for heads-up play (two players). Most published advice is written for full-ring games with several players in the pot, so part of any difference can come from that.

We also looked up a 3-handed version (the 6-4 bets and a third player showing Q-J calls before you act) in PokerToast's 3-handed solver, but it has not measured that spot often enough, so this page makes no claim about multiway pots.

How these numbers were made

From PokerToast's own heads-up limit Razz solver, trained 3,690,500 iterations, exported 2026-10-05 09:56:29, 35,165 situations (version R-3690500-20261005095629). It learned by self-play (Monte Carlo counterfactual regret minimization) for limit betting, at most four bets a street.

Practice it

Part of: Razz 4th street and later: bricks, pairs and made hands

More Razz spots: Razz: complete 8-6-3 against a King bring-in? · Razz: defend the bring-in with A-2 under a King when a 5 completes? · Razz: slowplay A-2-3 or complete against a King bring-in? · Razz: complete A-2-3 against a low (6) bring-in? · Razz 4th street: you catch a King, the opponent shows 5-2 and bets. Call or fold? · Razz 7th street: call with a 9-low against K-8-4-2? · Razz: steal with a 7 up (K-Q in the hole) against a King bring-in? · Razz 5th street: 7-5-2 with two bricks against 6-4-3. Fold? · Razz: brought in with an 8 (6-3 under), a 7 completes. Call or re-raise? · Razz: defend the bring-in with 3-2 under a Queen when an 8 completes? · Razz 4th street: you catch a 2, the opponent catches a King. Bet or check? · Razz 5th street: a made 9-8 low against 6-4-3 showing. Call, raise or fold? · Razz 6th street: a made 8-7 low against 7-5-4-2 showing. Call, raise or fold? · Razz: complete a three-card 9 (9-5-2) against a King bring-in? · Razz: a three-card 9 (9-5-2) against an 8 bring-in. Complete, call or fold? · Razz: a paired start (7-3-3) against a King bring-in. Complete? · Razz 7th street: an 8-7 low against 9-8-4-2, checked to you. Bet or check? · Razz: you complete 7-4-2, the 6 bring-in re-raises. Cap, call or fold? · Razz 5th street: four to a 7 with one brick against 6-4-3 showing. Call? · Razz 4th street: you both catch bricks and you act first. Bet or check? · Razz: a rough three-card 8 (8-7-6) against a 7 bring-in. Complete? · Razz: defend the bring-in with 8-5 under a King when a 7 completes?