PokerToast · study tools for mixed-game poker

In Razz, I brought in with a King (8-5 in the hole) and a 7 completes. Call, re-raise or fold?

Heads-up, PokerToast's limit Razz solver folds with 8-5 under a King when a 7 completes against its bring-in 60% of the time, and calls 35%.

The spot

The solver's numbers

The solver's answer
PlayHow often (strategy)Worth from here on (EV estimate, small bets)
Fold59.7%+0.00
Call35.1%+0.03
Re-raise5.3%+0.19

Measured on 5,451 play-outs of this situation. The highlighted row is the play that measured best.

Why, in plain words

Re-raise is worth about 0.15 small bets more than call on average from here on: putting more chips in now pays with this hand.

Note: the solver's strategy folds most often (60%), but in the measured play-outs re-raise came out ahead by 0.19 small bets. Training and measuring are separate estimates, so treat that gap as uncertain.

What popular strategy articles say

Defend your bring-in liberally; the completer often has little.

What strategy articles found by web search said on 2026-10-08 (PokerNews, Card Player, PokerStrategy, pokerskill and similar; mostly written between about 2007 and 2015, and mostly for full-ring games with several players in the pot).

Heads-up, the solver only partly agrees: its main play is fold (60%), but it also chooses call or re-raise 40% of the time.

Measured value from here on: fold +0.00 small bets, re-raise +0.19.

Heads-up vs multiway

The numbers above are for heads-up play (two players). Most published advice is written for full-ring games with several players in the pot, so part of any difference can come from that.

We also looked up a 3-handed version (the 7 completes and a third player showing a Queen calls before it is back to you) in PokerToast's 3-handed solver, but it has not measured that spot often enough, so this page makes no claim about multiway pots.

How these numbers were made

From PokerToast's own heads-up limit Razz solver, trained 3,690,500 iterations, exported 2026-10-05 09:56:29, 35,165 situations (version R-3690500-20261005095629). It learned by self-play (Monte Carlo counterfactual regret minimization) for limit betting, at most four bets a street.

Practice it

Part of: Razz 3rd street: completing, stealing and defending the bring-in

More Razz spots: Razz: complete 8-6-3 against a King bring-in? · Razz: defend the bring-in with A-2 under a King when a 5 completes? · Razz: slowplay A-2-3 or complete against a King bring-in? · Razz: complete A-2-3 against a low (6) bring-in? · Razz 4th street: you catch a King, the opponent shows 5-2 and bets. Call or fold? · Razz 7th street: call with a 9-low against K-8-4-2? · Razz: steal with a 7 up (K-Q in the hole) against a King bring-in? · Razz 5th street: 7-5-2 with two bricks against 6-4-3. Fold? · Razz: brought in with an 8 (6-3 under), a 7 completes. Call or re-raise? · Razz: defend the bring-in with 3-2 under a Queen when an 8 completes? · Razz 4th street: you catch a 2, the opponent catches a King. Bet or check? · Razz 4th street: you pair your 3, the opponent shows 6-4 and bets. Call or fold? · Razz 5th street: a made 9-8 low against 6-4-3 showing. Call, raise or fold? · Razz 6th street: a made 8-7 low against 7-5-4-2 showing. Call, raise or fold? · Razz: complete a three-card 9 (9-5-2) against a King bring-in? · Razz: a three-card 9 (9-5-2) against an 8 bring-in. Complete, call or fold? · Razz: a paired start (7-3-3) against a King bring-in. Complete? · Razz 7th street: an 8-7 low against 9-8-4-2, checked to you. Bet or check? · Razz: you complete 7-4-2, the 6 bring-in re-raises. Cap, call or fold? · Razz 5th street: four to a 7 with one brick against 6-4-3 showing. Call? · Razz 4th street: you both catch bricks and you act first. Bet or check? · Razz: a rough three-card 8 (8-7-6) against a 7 bring-in. Complete?