PokerToast · study tools for mixed-game poker

In Razz, should I defend my bring-in (King up, A-2 in the hole) when a 5 completes?

Heads-up, PokerToast's limit Razz solver calls with A-2 under a King when a 5 completes against its bring-in 99.6% of the time.

The spot

The solver's numbers

The solver's answer
PlayHow often (strategy)Worth from here on (EV estimate, small bets)
Call99.6%+0.17
Re-raise0.4%−0.39
Fold0.0%+0.00

Measured on 19,582 play-outs of this situation. The highlighted row is the play that measured best.

Why, in plain words

Call is worth about 0.56 small bets more than re-raise, so putting more chips in does not pay here; folding would give up the 0.17 small bets that call wins on average from here on.

What popular strategy articles say

No source answered this exact spot; the general advice is to defend your bring-in liberally (keep playing).

What AI search answers said when we asked this question on 2026-10-08. They cited strategy articles written mostly between about 2007 and 2013, and most of that advice is for full-ring games with several players in the pot.

Heads-up, the solver agrees: its main play is call (99.6%).

With three players the 3-handed solver plays it differently (it folds 99.9%; see below).

Heads-up vs multiway

The numbers above are for heads-up play (two players). Most published advice is written for full-ring games with several players in the pot, so part of any difference can come from that.

3-handed (the 5 completes and a third player showing a Queen calls before it is back to you), PokerToast's 3-handed solver folds 99.9% of the time. So with more players the answer changes.

3-handed solver
PlayHow often (strategy)Worth from here on (EV estimate, small bets)
Fold99.9%+0.00
Call0.1%−0.33
Re-raise0.0%−0.74

From the 3-handed limit Razz solver, trained 25,358,751 iterations, exported 2026-10-05 18:07:23, 172,805 situations (version R33-25358751-20261005180723); measured on 1,258 play-outs.

How these numbers were made

From PokerToast's own heads-up limit Razz solver, trained 3,690,500 iterations, exported 2026-10-05 09:56:29, 35,165 situations (version R-3690500-20261005095629). It learned by self-play (Monte Carlo counterfactual regret minimization) for limit betting, at most four bets a street.

Practice it

Part of: Razz 3rd street: completing, stealing and defending the bring-in

More Razz spots: Razz: complete 8-6-3 against a King bring-in? · Razz: slowplay A-2-3 or complete against a King bring-in? · Razz: complete A-2-3 against a low (6) bring-in? · Razz 4th street: you catch a King, the opponent shows 5-2 and bets. Call or fold? · Razz 7th street: call with a 9-low against K-8-4-2? · Razz: steal with a 7 up (K-Q in the hole) against a King bring-in? · Razz 5th street: 7-5-2 with two bricks against 6-4-3. Fold? · Razz: brought in with an 8 (6-3 under), a 7 completes. Call or re-raise? · Razz: defend the bring-in with 3-2 under a Queen when an 8 completes? · Razz 4th street: you catch a 2, the opponent catches a King. Bet or check? · Razz 4th street: you pair your 3, the opponent shows 6-4 and bets. Call or fold? · Razz 5th street: a made 9-8 low against 6-4-3 showing. Call, raise or fold? · Razz 6th street: a made 8-7 low against 7-5-4-2 showing. Call, raise or fold? · Razz: complete a three-card 9 (9-5-2) against a King bring-in? · Razz: a three-card 9 (9-5-2) against an 8 bring-in. Complete, call or fold? · Razz: a paired start (7-3-3) against a King bring-in. Complete? · Razz 7th street: an 8-7 low against 9-8-4-2, checked to you. Bet or check? · Razz: you complete 7-4-2, the 6 bring-in re-raises. Cap, call or fold? · Razz 5th street: four to a 7 with one brick against 6-4-3 showing. Call? · Razz 4th street: you both catch bricks and you act first. Bet or check? · Razz: a rough three-card 8 (8-7-6) against a 7 bring-in. Complete? · Razz: defend the bring-in with 8-5 under a King when a 7 completes?